|  
             Critical 
              Factors Activity 
               Silent 
              Generation Of Ideas In Writing 
              Read the focus question and ask participants to list their responses 
              in phrases or brief sentences. Work silently and independently on 
              spaces provided below. (Allow four to eight minutes.) 
            Focus 
              Question 
              What kinds of plans need to be in place to serve a community if 
              there is a natural disaster? 
            Key Factors 
              1. 
              2. 
              3. 
              4. 
              5. 
              6. 
            Note: 
              In your focus group, using the Nominal Group Process below, list 
              and priority rank your responses. 
            The 
              Nominal Group Technique 
              The nominal group process is a method for structuring groups to 
              allow individual judgments to be pooled and used when there is uncertainty 
              or disagreement about the nature of the problem and possible solutions. 
              The process is helpful in identifying problems, exploring solutions, 
              and establishing priorities. It works best with groups of five to 
              nine participants. 
            Step 1: Round-Robin 
              recording of ideas.  
              Go around the group, getting one idea from each participant. Write 
              the ideas on newsprint. As each sheet is filled, tape it on the 
              wall so that the entire list is visible. Number each item. Leave 
              space to the left of each number to record votes later. Encourage 
              hitchhiking on other ideas. Discourage discussion, elaboration, 
              or justification. 
            Step 2: Serial discussion 
              of the list of ideas.  
              Clarification: The purpose of this step is clarification. Read item 
              one aloud and invite clarifying comments. Then read item two and 
              continue discussing each item in turn until the list is covered. 
              Arguments are unnecessary because each participant will have a chance 
              to vote independently in Step 3. As soon as the logic and meaning 
              of the item are clear, it is time to cut off discussion. 
            Categorization: Once 
              each item has been discussed, duplicate items should be identified 
              and combined. This may necessitate rewriting some of the items before 
              the voting step. However, resist the temptation to combine many 
              items into broader categories because achieving consensus by this 
              means, the precision of the original items may be lost or the combined 
              item will become so abstract and all-inclusive that the group in 
              effect is able to avoid the difficult choices inherent in priotizing. 
            Step 3: Voting.  
              Each participant selects five items that are most important to him 
              or her, writes them down, and rank orders them (1 = least important; 
              5 = most important). Record the priority of numbers on newsprint 
              in front of the group. The numbers are then added, resulting in 
              a total for each item. Items can then be prioritized -- those items 
              with the highest numbers are considered the highest priority. 
            Note: 
              Place a star beside the 3 priority concerns...in your collective 
              judgment. 
           |